Talk:Ken Kurson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ken Kurson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:55, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Accusations[edit]

Wikipedia is not a gossip column. This isnt worthy of accusations until there's a lawsuit on this matter it must not be on this page.Thereragea (talk) 23:14, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Thereragea (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Copied from Editor assistance/Requests, FYI. — TransporterMan (TALK) 18:32, 17 March 2018 (UTC) (Not watching this page) [reply]

Can i receive assistance on this bio as i understand it BLP shouldnt include accusations? Thereragea (talk) 23:13, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That's not correct. If the person is a public figure, which is clearly the case here, accusations can be included so long as they are well-documented by reliable sources, see the BLPCRIME policy. However, the PUBLICFIGURE policy requires there to be multiple (which means at least two) reliable sources for the information and I can only find the Atlantic one already cited in the edit in question and stories either about that story, which don't count as a second source, or from sources which Wikipedia doesn't consider to be clearly reliable (and high-quality, clearly-reliable sources are needed for contentious information about living persons). So I'm not going to revert your removal for that reason. But if someone does find a second clearly-reliable source there's no reason the information cannot be in the article. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 18:27, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think that in light of the subsequent criminal charges, which directly stemmed from the Copaken allegations, resulting in multiple coverage satisfiying WP:PUBLICFIGURE, the Copaken allegations definitely belong in the article. Coretheapple (talk) 16:56, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Divorce[edit]

The spouse section in the side bar is inaccurate. The subject divorced his first wife in 2015. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.54.220.27 (talk) 04:59, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]