Talk:Kawasaki C-2

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kawasaki C-2 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Aircraft Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Start

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / Asian / Japanese

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Asian military history task force
	Japanese military history task force

Japan: Military history Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 15:28, May 10, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese military history task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Photograph[edit]

(not given supporting materials due to uncertainty over licensing of the photograph)

I am a user of a Japanese version.

Is the copyright in this photograph really GFDL?

Japan defense ministry Technical Research and Development Institute is forbidding reprint without permission in the photograph.

TRDI (Japanese)--210.131.1.48 13:04, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proper designation[edit]

What is this aircraft's proper designation - the article uses a mix of "C-X", "XC-2" and "C-2". It isn't always clear which designation relates to which stage of the development process. As I understand it the initial design was called "C-X", the test prototype(s) "XC-2" and the actual certified production version is the "C-2". I'm not at all sure that I understand it correctly and the article (as it is now) doesn't really help to clarify the matter. Roger (talk) 08:18, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The development program was designated C-X, The first prototype is designasted XC-2, the procurement program is designated C-2. Seemples, yes.Petebutt (talk) 09:39, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved: insufficient support. DrKiernan (talk) 16:39, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kawasaki C-2 → Kawasaki XC-2 – To reflect the name of the aircraft rather than the procurement program. Per Kawasaki Heavy Industries' own website: http://www.khi.co.jp/english/aero/product/airplanes/xc_2.html memphisto 12:39, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose the XC-2 is only the prototype, if it doesnt go into production it may be appropriate but it is certain the series build aircraft will be C-2s. MilborneOne (talk) 18:36, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kawasaki C-2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040618043226/http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2004/q2/nr_040614n.html to http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2004/q2/nr_040614n.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:27, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Checked. Redalert2fan (talk) 12:39, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Kawasaki C-2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:35, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Checked. Redalert2fan (talk) 12:40, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Main accidents[edit]

Can somebody write in the article some sentences of accidents of this aircraft?--Porbóllett (talk) 11:20, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only accidents are probably notable here. And based on what sources? --Finlayson (talk) 15:33, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]