Talk:Karel Hlaváček

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Who decided, that Hlaváček's first book is not important? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.194.193.31 (talk) 12:10, 12 November 2009 (UTC) Whoever wrote the original entry apparently thought the first book wasn't important. I haven't read it, but my understanding is that it's not as important as the others. I toned down the wording. Hlaváček is more significant than this entry has suggested; this page needs more work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.148.204.127 (talk) 00:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]