Talk:KangaRoos

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Running Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Running, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of running on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RunningWikipedia:WikiProject RunningTemplate:WikiProject RunningRunning articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge tag all running related articles with {{WikiProject Running}} adding assessment and importance parameters when missing find references for articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Running/Unreferenced BLPs adopt an article and promote it to GA

St. Louis Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject St. Louis, a project to build and improve articles related to St. Louis and the surrounding metropolitan area. We invite you to join the project and contribute to the discussion.St. LouisWikipedia:WikiProject St. LouisTemplate:WikiProject St. LouisSt. Louis articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

NPOV[edit]

"KangaROOS were considered the absolute ultimate in athletic footwear"
A little POV don't you think? --unsigned by 70.64.188.255 at 09:41, 20 March 2006

Why don't YOU write it then? --unsigned by User:Valor19 at 09:07, 21 March 2006.

True dat --BjKa (talk) 16:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Dynacoil part is highly NPOV, as is much of the article. --Jmlk17 15:27, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then fix it --BjKa (talk) 16:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Company[edit]

So, after the resurrection, is it still the same company? Who owned it before? - Who owns it now? --BjKa (talk) 16:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lemma[edit]

The current spelling "KangaRoos" is obviously rubbish. It should either be "KangaROOS", like the company write themselves, or "Kangaroos" if you subscribe to the viewpoint that Wikipedia shouldn't adopt every strange spelling a company will invent for its brandname. I would change it to the oficial brand spelling if that page didn't already exist as a redirection here. (This might involve deletion first. I'm not sure about that.) --BjKa (talk) 16:33, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]