Talk:Kamboja Pala dynasty

India: West Bengal / History Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as High-importance).

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

Vandalusm[edit]

Before placing this nonsensical and irrelevant template here, come and discuss the information in this article from historical point of view. This is vandalusm. Sze cavalry01 18:53, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied here. - Ganeshk (talk) 07:18, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion[edit]

Propose merge. They are the same dynasty, or variants of the same dynasty. Should be covered in one article within the series on the History of Bengal. Itsmejudith (talk) 18:24, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear. There seems to be no end to Kamboja-cruft. Merge away. Moreschi (talk) 00:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They were a separate kingdom from the Pala Empire whose rulers used the same suffix; pala(which just means Protector in Sanskrit). I disagree with the merge since they were neither the same dynasty nor a variant of them. Perhaps it would be less confusing if the article was moved to Kamboja-Pala Kingdom instead--Reahad (talk) 21:21, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See Pala dynasty (Kamarupa) for another example of an independent dynasty with the same suffix.--Reahad (talk) 22:22, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you can improve these articles without merger then that is great. We need editors who know this history. Please go ahead. Itsmejudith (talk) 22:29, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Opposed. Though there is room for improvement the article by itself seems legitimate.--Joostik (talk) 15:00, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Native name[edit]

(Punjabi: ਕਮ੍ਬੋਜ, Hindi: कम्बोज) Were inappropriately listed on the Sanskrit article on the Kamboja but might be the name of this dynasty. If they are, please add to the lede, with transliterations. — LlywelynII 20:22, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No such dynasty[edit]

It might be worth pointing out in the article that there never was a Kamboja Pala dynasty.PiCo (talk) 10:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mleccha[edit]

Though many have translated Mlechchha (Malecha etc.)in their own ways as foreigners (mistranslation) etc. the name actually refers to the inhabitants of the Indus Valley Civilization (Meluhha, Melussa). --Novo24 (talk) 04:05, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Map of Bengal in 958 CE.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:38, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]