Talk:Junior Lake

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 22 December 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Wbm1058 (talk) 21:25, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Junior Lake (baseball) → Junior Lake – he is the primary topic. [1] [2] Joeykai (talk) 19:08, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose - if we search "Junior Lake is" Google Books then clearly Junior Lake (Vancouver Island) has a claim to primary topic. But given the real lake fails to pass both the criteria for primary topic, there is, as so often, no primary topic. Leave as is. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:22, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - I think a google books search is not a particularly useful way of searching.. a straight up google search or a google news search reveals far more on the baseball player.. Plus the Vancouver Lake article currently has only one line and no substantial sourcing so it may not even pass GNG in its current state. Spanneraol (talk) 16:21, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - If the baseball player becomes truly famous I could see arguing that he is the primary topic. But as for now I agree with In ictu oculi that there is no primary topic. Rlendog (talk) 16:26, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support 90-day page views for at http://stats.grok.se/en/latest90/Junior%20Lake%20%28baseball%29 is 3040. 90-day page views for at http://stats.grok.se/en/latest90/Junior%20Lake%20%28Vancouver%20Island%29 is 114. Based on viewership data there is a clear primary.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:25, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per IIO and Rlendog; no pennants, no world series, was placed on waivers after third season(!!), no awards, so seemingly not overly notable. Being in his prime and placed on waivers for any team to take instead of being traded not a good career so far. WP:RECENTISM for being placed on waivers and being claimed -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 07:54, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Look at WP:PRIMARY. The only Junior Lake is the baseball player and the actual lake. Page view statistics, internal wikilinks, and english sources all point to the baseball player being far more notable. Joeykai (talk) 21:29, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Per TonyTheTiger's evidence, this is the clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC in a WP:TWODABS situation. "Junior Lake" baseball also returns several times more Google News hits than "Junior Lake" Vancouver (and most of the latter are actually for the ball player). Despite being comparatively recent in notability, the baseball player already trumps the lake on Google Books as well: "Junior Lake" baseball returns 77, compared to 26 for "Junior Lake" Vancouver.--Cúchullain t/c 16:44, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per the evidence provided by TonyTheTiger and User:Cuchullain. There is also the matter of significance - specifically, how little of it the actual lake seems to have. It appears to have an article simply because almost every lake qualifies for an article under WP:NGEO, which is fine, but that should be kept in mind when deciding what is and is not a primary topic. The article on the actual lake is one sentence long. The article on Vancouver Island, where the lake is, doesn't even mention it. Egsan Bacon (talk) 19:57, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Clearly meets the usage criterion of primary topic (no one could debate that) and the lake in Vancouver is so obscure I don't think a credible argument can be made that it is more educationally significant. Jenks24 (talk) 10:59, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Junior Lake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Junior_Lake&oldid=1207972452"