Talk:Journée de solidarité envers les personnes âgées

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article Title[edit]

I'm not at all sure that Corvée Day is correct. At best it seems to be a nickname for the day (doesn't even appear in the text of the french version). It's also somewhat POV. No idea for an alternative though. Mcewan (talk) 21:43, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm french and I never heard this name before reading it here... It was a very nice but not comic POV from the inital author. I rename with the french name... I don't know if english spokem media used the term Day of solidarity with the elderly... --GdGourou - °o° - Talk to me 17:49, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article also introduces the phrase "Slave Day" in the latter section. Is a phrase corresponding to this used in French? I tagged the section for neutrality and reference needed. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 00:43, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I remember to have heard a phrase such as "Slave Day" but it was used by workers' unions. References are indeed needed but as far as I know, main opinions are presented (with both main workers' and main corporate managers' unions). On top of the controversy, the article could mention the complex cases raised by the law: that what gives a Google search on "journée de solidarité" (about strike on a non paid day, about part-time job, about fixed term contract leading to several non paid days the same year, etc). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.74.186.85 (talk) 21:26, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
  1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
  2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
  3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:19, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Journée de solidarité envers les personnes âgées. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:19, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]