Talk:Joseph Dennie/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 21:55, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   • Everything looks great with this article, so I am going to pass it to GA status. Very nice work! Please let me know if you have any questions. As a couple of points, as I saw from the Peer Review that you may take the article to FAC: There should probably be a reference directly after the block quote in the Publishing career section, and it would probably be worth spending some more time searching for any additional available sources that could fill in some of the blank spots in his life. Dana boomer (talk) 22:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)