Talk:José Cortez

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Worst kicker in the NFL?[edit]

Should some mention be made of just how terrible Jose Cortez is? This article has the tone suggesting he isn't one of the worst active NFL starting kickers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.118.247.101 (talkcontribs)

Yes. I haven't been able to do it and make it sound POV. He isn't actually a starting kicker at the moment; when it comes to field goals, he's a backup. I have to wonder though: his agent must be amazing, that he's been signed so many times, after a record of failure...How stupid do teams have to be to sign this guy? -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 03:03, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
One way to make it work would be to cite statistics. The stats here don't discuss attempts and made, so there's no percentage ratio. And no yardage/attempt breakdown. -- Mikeblas 16:05, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on José Cortez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]