This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Johnny Trí Nguyễn article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article was nominated for deletion on 15 August 2013. The result of the discussion was Delete.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
I was contacted by an editor about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Tri Nguyen (August 2013), and I have to say I am absolutely staggered by the way that was processed. Even with a badly written unsourced stub a click through to the interwiki articles in half a dozen languages or simple Google search would have picked up reliable sources indicating the top levels of notability. Given this I have no hesitation in recreating a stub (though I'm guessing not much was lost) In ictu oculi (talk) 00:57, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
