Talk:John Swift (cricketer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Move article and disambiguation. Cúchullain t/c 13:42, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

– Too many alternatives on the disambiguation page to safely assume this person is the primary topic. Powers T 00:57, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. The cricketer is arguably the most notable, but I agree that readers are not "much more likely" to be searching for the cricketer than the others listed on the dab page when typing in "John Swift". Jenks24 (talk) 07:26, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Cricketers are not that searchable, despite "significance". While I love cricket, American readers would prefer someone else with the same name. --George Ho (talk) 00:31, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • If you are suggesting that cricketers can never be the primary topic, that's ridiculous. Jenks24 (talk) 07:48, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.