Talk:John Gould Stephenson

John Gould Stephenson has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 27, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Indiana Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Low-importance).

Library of Congress Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Date of death[edit]

The text of the article says he died in November of 1882, but his headstone says he died in 1883. Which is more accurate, and by what source? —Gordon P. Hemsley→✉ 16:52, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks for noticing that! Gamaliel (talk) 17:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that John Gould Stephenson fought at the Battle of Gettysburg while working as the Librarian of Congress? Source: https://www.jstor.org/stable/29781670 pg. 86
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Prunus jamasakura

5x expanded by Generalissima (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 42 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 08:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Really lovely expansion today, long enough, no plagiarism issues, very interesting hook with a reliable source. Thanks for this! Spaghettifier (talk) 22:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

Passed. Hog Farm _Talk 02:19, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:John Gould Stephenson/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 08:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 21:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this either later this week or over the weekend. Hog Farm _Talk 21:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do any of the sources explain what exactly he did as an Indiana resident to campaign for Lincoln who was running for a congressional seat in Illinois? Was he going across state lines to speak to crowds?
- Presumably, although none of them explicitly say this except about the 1860 race. - G
"William P. Dole, Lincoln's Commissioner of Indian Affairs" - is this the same William P. Dole as earlier?
- Yep. Shortened to just last name to make this clear. - G
"Spofford noted that he "devoted a large portion of his time" to care for ill soldiers of the 119th Indiana Regiment in late September 1861," - I'm highly confused by this. The "119th Indiana Regiment" in the Civil War was the 7th Indiana Cavalry Regiment, which was not formed until 1863. Yes, the source indicates the 119th Indiana Regiment quoting Spofford, but I really do think Spofford had to be in error here and Carter just didn't catch it. I can't find any reference to an Indiana militia unit of the time known by the ordinal. It's possible this is simply an error for the 19th Indiana, but I just don't see how that source could be right. Wood actually has that he was giving services to members of the hospitalized 19th Indiana regiment in mid-1861, so I would imagine that that is the correct thing
- Ooh, good catch! I was unsure about that too, but I think you're right that it's the 19th in both instances. Corrected. - G
"as an aide-de-camp, later achieving the rank of Colonel" - colonel should not be capitalized when using it in this fashion. Referring to Colonel Stephenson would be correct, but it would be "Stephenson was a colonel"
- Thank you, corrected. - G
"He received a citation for his service at Gettysburg from General Abner Doubleday" - use Doubleday's precise rank of Major General (as supported by Wood) since "General" in current US military parlence refers to a specific four-star rank
- Fixed. - G
"In either November 1881[27] or July 1883,[26]" - the citations for the varying date are flipped-flopped here. Wood actually supports the 1881 date and Carter the 1883 one
- Oops! Fixed. - G
The body of the article never actually states that Spofford was his successor, only the infobox and an image caption
- Stated this explicitly, good catch. - G

I noted no issues with image licensing for GA review, although some things might need to be documented a bit better if this were to go to FAC. I have no concerns with source reliability. I conducted periodic spot-checks from Wood and Carter while reading through the article and noted no issues with except for the one minor reference placement issue noted above. Hog Farm _Talk 00:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hog Farm: Thank you very much! I think I made the changes requested. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 00:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.