Talk:John Coape Sherbrooke

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Is Sherbrook (yes, no"e") Street in Winnipeg also named for J.C., and how did it come to lose the "e"? Esseh 22:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Coape Sherbrooke. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:05, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded citations[edit]

C class. It will be promoted to B class when the following issue is fixed. It is not necessary to cite every sentence when a group of sentences can be cited from the same source. There were 5 "Heathcote1" citations in paragraph 1 of Early career. They have been re-edited to 2 citations. Please review the updated version to see how it is done, then please fix other paragraphs with the same problem. Thanks. Note that if every sentence in the paragraph is from the same source, then only one citation is needed at the end. Another example is shown below. Djmaschek (talk) 02:42, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Dormskirk here because now I'm very unsure as to what path I'm meant to be taking with these references! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 10:21, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I have reverted my edit to ensure consensus. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 10:24, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Incorrect: Sentence 1.<citation1> Sentence 2.<citation1> Sentence 3.<citation2> Sentence 4.<citation1> Sentence 5.<citation1> Sentence 6.<citation1>
  • Correct: Sentence 1. Sentence 2.<citation1> Sentence 3.<citation2> Sentence 4. Sentence 5. Sentence 6.<citation1>
    I'm going to start trying to use them in articles from now on. Being rather new to all this they've scared me a little up to this point! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:00, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hey Pickersgill-Cunliffe, if you want a hand with sfns, feel free to hit me up - they're my preferred citation style and I'm happy to help show you the ropes. ♠PMC(talk) 21:13, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi, through staring at them on other articles for long enough I think I've got the idea now but I'll make sure to contact you if it turns out I've just deluded myself! Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:28, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sounds good, cheers :) ♠PMC(talk) 21:41, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]