Talk:Johann Caspar Ferdinand Fischer

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Composers

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers articles

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Pipe Organ Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pipe Organ, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pipe Organ on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pipe OrganWikipedia:WikiProject Pipe OrganTemplate:WikiProject Pipe OrganPipe organ articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Should this be moved?[edit]

Maybe we should move the article to Johann Caspar Ferdinand Fischer. It is, after all, his full name; besides, all other Wikipedias name the article that way. Any objections? Jashiin 20:10, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Responsible for French influence?[edit]

The phrase "...he was responsible for bringing the French influence to German music." is a bit of an overstatement, since Froberger, Weckmann, Buxtehude, Bach, etc. all incorporated French influences. fzirp 18:33, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this should be reworded somehow, but I think the statement is sort of true (I reckon it was I who added it to the article, but that was before I started writing down my sources :( ). He brought the influence of French composers of his time to Germany, ie. the French orchestral suite, Lully, etc. Froberger and Weckmann both worked at a time when that French school was just starting out (Froberger was mostly influenced by the last generation of French lute composers, and himself helped shape the French harpsichord school. And Weckmann studied French music from what Froberger sent him). Buxtehude only has some French elements in his harpsichord suites, which, as far as I know, were not very well known in Germany. The same applies to Pachelbel. As for Bach, he was much younger (about 20-30 years, according to Grove) than Fischer and was actually influenced by him. Jashiin 19:10, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would go along with the "of his time" revision, or it could read something like: "He was among those responsible for bringing French influence into German music". fzirp (talk) 18:45, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I take some issue with "...he was also one of the first composers to apply the principles of the orchestral suite to the harpsichord, replacing the standard French ouverture with an unmeasured prelude" also. For one, was it the orchestral suite that was applied to the harpsichord, or the other way 'round? Second, the unmeasured preludes are generally credited to the French composers first and foremest, e.g. Louis Couperin. He may have been in innovator in Germany, of course, but the sentence doesn't make that clear. JTL 05:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.174.187.208 (talk)