Talk:Joey Badass

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

joey bada$$ family family St. Lucian not Jamaican[edit]

please edit.joey bada$$

His family are from St Lucia, his grandparents still live there. There's a youtube documentary by him showing his journey home to meet his grandfather.


69.80.24.100 (talk) 14:47, 9 November 2013 (UTC) 14:47, 9 November 2013 (UTC)69.80.24.100 (talk) 69.80.24.100 (talk) 14:47, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Thanks, Celestra (talk) 00:38, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This has now been addressed in the text by another editor. Next time, please provide a link to reliable sources backing up your proposed addition/change. Dana boomer (talk) 19:46, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joey Badass. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:56, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joey Badass. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:21, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Solar eclipse[edit]

Was this real news or a beat-up?

If real it should be included in the article. If a beat-up it might still warrant a mention as such, due to getting headlines worldwide. —DIV (120.17.145.234 (talk) 04:09, 23 January 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Requested move 24 August 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not Moved(non-admin closure) Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 07:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Joey BadassJoey Bada$$ – "Joey Bada$$" is his official stage name and is used much more often than "Joey Badass". Momo824 (talk) 05:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Relisting. 2pou (talk) 16:04, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All of the sources you referenced have also referred to him as "Joey Bada$$".[1][2][3][4][5][6] A Google search for "Joey Bada$$" (with quotation marks) returns 2.6 million results, while "Joey Badass" only returns 1.3 million. Momo824 (talk) 09:14, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  • Oppose per MOS:TM: This is a purely decorative stylism that is not followed consistently in independent reliable sources. As far as I can see, the NYT, Complex, and CNN sources listed by Binksternet do not refer to him as "Joey Bada$$". (CNN might appear to do so at first glance, but it's just linking to the artist's video on YouTube, not using the decorative styling in the part written by CNN itself.) —BarrelProof (talk) 19:20, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Opposeit is a stylization which is discouraged when not used exclusively by sources. cookie monster (2020) 755 23:13, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. This stylization does not belong in the article title. Rreagan007 (talk) 02:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Other artist's song sample in "Controversy" section?[edit]

Does a clip from another artist really belong in this article? The only music sample on the entire page isn't even performed by the subject. I know the song's content is targeted at Joey, but I don't think we need more than a textual explanation of the associated feud. I've half a mind to remove it. However, not wanting to step on any toes, I thought I would raise the question here first. If there are no objections in the next week or so, I'll take it out myself. ~~Mattevt | Hit me up 05:04, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

After two weeks without opposition, I've gone ahead and removed the sample. If you believe this removal was unwarranted, please feel free to respond here to discuss its re-inclusion. ~~Mattevt | Hit me up 21:10, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]