Talk:Jewish mysticism

Spirituality Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirituality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spirituality-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritualityWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritualityTemplate:WikiProject SpiritualitySpirituality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Religion Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of religion

Judaism Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jewish culture Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish cultureTemplate:WikiProject Jewish cultureJewish culture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mysticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mysticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mysticism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MysticismWikipedia:WikiProject MysticismTemplate:WikiProject MysticismMysticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Redirection to Kabbalah[edit]

This should not be! Kabbalah is not the only manifestation of Jewish mysticism. An automatic redirect from Jewish mysticism to Kabbalah might also suggest that Kabbalah is a standard part of mainstream Judaism, which is not the case. This should be a disambiguation page. --Ori Livneh (talk..contribs) 17:26, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but: Nowadays, the only followed forms of Jewish mysticism are 1 Kabbalah and 2 Hasidic Judaism, which is based on Kabbalah (you could call it "Hasidic Kabbalah"). See the full present-ongoing discussion of this Jewish mysticism page development issue at Talk:Kabbalah#Development of Jewish mysticism article (begun February 2013, in case it becomes archived in the future). N.B. You said, "An automatic redirect from Jewish mysticism to Kabbalah might also suggest that Kabbalah is a standard part of mainstream Judaism, which is not the case." - why is "Jewish mysticism" more mainstream itself than Kabbalah? It seems just as mainsteam/heterodox itself. However, I do think that Kabbalah is mainstream to Judaism: Before the Haskalah, it's theology in Lurianic Kabbalah was basically universal. Since the Haskalah, and with the modern culture of personal autonomy/choice, it remains an equally valid, and equally mainstream personal option in Jewish theology to a) a ressurgent Maimonidean Medieval Jewish philosophy Orthodox Judaism rationalism, or 2) a Non-Orthodox Judaism modern Jewish philosophy rationalism, or 3) a Neo-Hasidic Non-Orthodox Judaism Reform/Reconstructionist non-fundamentalist Kabbalism.

However, I do like your idea to make this a dissambiguation page. April8 (talk) 21:37, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on Talk:Kabbalah page[edit]

N.B. This is being discussed on Talk:Kabbalah#Development of Jewish mysticism article (begun February 2013).

I've redirected this redirect page to Kabbalah#History of Jewish mysticism section. April8 (talk) 21:37, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On second thoughts, as explained on Talk:Kabbalah#Development of Jewish mysticism article (see there), I'll turn this into the dissambiguation page discussed above April8 (talk) 22:27, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jewish mysticism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304023856/http://www.yctorah.org/component/option,com_docman/task,doc_view/gid,312 to http://www.yctorah.org/component/option,com_docman/task,doc_view/gid,312/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:35, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Antisemitism[edit]

If ya google this wikipedia entry, the first thing that pops up is a rather antisemitic picture

Indeed there is a strange pic there, which is copied from a Youtube video produced by somebody called Kalman Bland PhD. You can blame Google and that guy, but not wikipedia. we had nothing to do with it. -Roxy, the dog. barcus 15:27, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal for new WikiProject[edit]

I have made a proposal at Wikipedia: WikiProject Council for a new WikiProject - WikiProject Mysticism. I wonder whether any readers of this article would like to join me in helping this WikiProject get started? Vorbee (talk) 07:32, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dates - CE/BCE vs BC/AD[edit]

Is there a reason why an article about Jewish tradition is using /Christian/ dating rather than its secular equivalents? Even in academic scholarly works, Jewish authors and some non-Jewish but culturally respectful secular academics use CE (Common Era) and BCE (Before the Common Era). It is jarring to use Jesus Christ as a dating reference point in an article about a Jewish cultural phenomenon (AD = Anno Domino = In the year of our Lord, Lord = Christ; BC = Before Christ) when there is a perfectly good academically accepted and secular equivalent. 2A02:ED0:6DD1:1400:DD87:F77D:3F52:6958 (talk) 08:34, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article previously had a mixed usage. I have revised it to be consistent. Editor2020 (talk) 18:32, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]