Talk:Jeopardy!/GA3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MrWooHoo (talk · contribs) 17:56, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm BrandonWu, and I'll be the reviewer for this article. I hope to work through the GA review in a time period for 7 days, and I'll get the review started very soon! Brandon (MrWooHoo)Talk to Brandon! 17:59, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note that there are two reviews other than this one. Here are the links: the first review, and the second review.


Review[edit]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
    See below for a prose review!
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Lead is good, and rest of the article does follow MOS
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
    See below for a source review as well!
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Major aspects covered!
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    Images provided are good.
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

See below for the Source and Prose reviews. Brandon (MrWooHoo)Talk to Brandon! 18:10, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

After further comments on the nom's talk page, the article is deemed GA! :D Brandon (MrWooHoo)Talk to Brandon! 01:27, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Prose Review[edit]

Source Review[edit]