Talk:Jean de Florette/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting review.Pyrotec (talk) 21:11, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Initial review[edit]

The article looks quite reasonable.

It's some what under wikilinked, so I've added a few as I've skimmed through/read the article; and in places the article needs minor points of clarification. I've also added the {CinemaofFrance} flag which was missing from this article, but was in use in other articles in this category.Pyrotec (talk) 21:39, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GAR[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Congratulations, I'm awarding GA-status.Pyrotec (talk) 18:39, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]