Talk:Jean's Way

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Death: Suicide Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Suicide task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Terminology[edit]

The term self-deliverance is used in the article - I'm not sure what connotations it has. I'm trying to stay with WP:NPOV, but I'm not sure if there are any terms that would be considered generally NPOV as it's a controversial subject.Autarch (talk) 18:22, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dust jacket?[edit]

This book says the 2003 printing has a new dust jacket design; but that the edition is availalable for eReaders and in paperback. Certainly, e-books don't have dust jackets. Paperback books sometimes (but rarely) have dust jackets. Is this book unique in that regard, or is that section of the article simply incorrect? (This section has other issues because of its lack of references.) -- Mikeblas (talk) 21:37, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]