Talk:Jason Crow

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Concerns over article content[edit]

This person is no longer married to Desirae. He is divorced.

70.112.10.178 (talk) 17:04, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Got a source for that? – Muboshgu (talk) 17:43, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.dropbox.com/s/n78hi0odqqnyvkd/Crow%20Divorce%20Denver%20District.pdf?dl=0 70.112.10.178 (talk) 17:13, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.dropbox.com/s/n78hi0odqqnyvkd/Crow%20Divorce%20Denver%20District.pdf?dl=0
70.112.10.178 (talk) 17:56, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Got a WP:SECONDARY source? Using WP:PRIMARY sourcing is dicey. I don't see anywhere in the filing that the divorce is granted and final (it may say that but I'm not a lawyer). Also, we aren't able to source to files in someone's Dropbox account, as it's on the spam blacklist. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:05, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
can i use primary documentation some other way? 2600:1702:1DF0:6360:5505:D1FD:C9D6:1394 (talk) 16:52, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
any editors have information about this? thanks, high priority. 70.112.10.178 (talk) 23:08, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
unique situation - no news coverage of the divorce & the court records are sealed to the public. how can we get this changed? 23.228.172.4 (talk) 00:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If there are no public sources whatsoever we have no way of verifying that this document is legitimate. A (public) statement from the subject would be sufficient per WP:ABOUTSELF even if it wasn't in the news, but it would need to be somehow verifiable. i.e. even if you were Crow and asserted that you had gotten divorced on here, we would have no way of confirming that you weren't some random person pretending to be him. Rusalkii (talk) 00:23, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It *may* be possible to just remove the mention of the spouse entirely, without saying that they were divorced, but I would be reluctant to do even that without a better source that a random dropbox link from an IP editor. Rusalkii (talk) 00:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

COI tag (August 2023)[edit]

Multiple edits from US Congress IPs; overall sounds like a campaign brochure Rusalkii (talk) 23:22, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have just removed the tag, which is unwarranted. The US Congress IP edits are minimal. If you have specific concerns about what "sounds like a campaign brochure", bring them up. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]