Talk:James Reilly (Irish politician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Office holder?[edit]

Why was the info box changed from politician to office holder? What office does he hold? I assume that offices only includes offices of state. I'm not aware of him holding any such office. Jobs within parties hardly count, do they? Laurel Lodged (talk) 20:15, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Politician redirects to Infobox officeholder, infact nearly all public office infoboxes redirect to officeholder now. All of people have been doing a good job over there on standardise occupational infoboxes. James Reilly is a TD for Dublin North. If you assume that offices only includes offices of state, then you are wrong. Its for all public offices. There are one or two million examples on here, so I'm surprised you haven't seen one before. Here is an example: Tony Blair, note the infobox contains his premiership, ministerial offices and MP office. Snappy (talk) 22:09, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Debt[edit]

The articles cited note that the debt of €1.9m is owed by Dr. Reilly and four co-investors. The entry in Stubbs Gazette notes similarly. My edit was correct. The debt of €1.9m is owed by Dr. Reilly. It is also owed by his four co-investors. Dr. Reilly's % shareholding is immaterial.

I think editing Bondage suits is more your style. Welcome back! Snappy (talk) 21:20, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Yes, it has been a while. I'm surprised to see you make a connection between Dr. Reilly and gimp suits but if you can cite credible sources... Anyway, I am right about what those articles state about the extent of his liabilities.Spirit of 1916 (talk) 12:43, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You are partially correct. I have clarified the article. Snappy (talk) 18:30, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No, fully correct but your edit does add usefully.Spirit of 1916 (talk) 18:41, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No, partially correct because you failed to clarify the 9% issue. Snappy (talk) 19:10, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't wish to argue, but I am fully correct. You reverted my original edit which corrected a significant misconception about his liability; his shareholding is a completely different issue. Presumably you didn't take the time to read what the sources actually said before reverting. To say that my edit was only partially correct would be similar to stating that your edit is only partially correct in that it fails to deal with Dr. Reilly's statement of 11th July where he explains how the debt and subsequent litigation arose. Interestingly, he made a point of mentioning in his statement that although his interest in the co-ownership is just over 9%, he holds 25% of the recourse co-owners' interest.Spirit of 1916 (talk) 18:22, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yet you failed to mention all this in your edits, which means you were not fully correct. Snappy (talk) 18:27, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well in that case, neither were you.Spirit of 1916 (talk) 18:29, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please expand the article[edit]

What schools did he attend? Anything on the "You don't like the pay, go flip burgers" Doesn't this man also own a couple of pharmacies? Nothing about potential conflicts of interest regarding his ownership of pharmacies, his share in privatized caring homes etc — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.46.240.204 (talk) 12:55, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV[edit]

  • Nothing at all about situating two primary care facilities in his constituency, against expert advice? This is what prompted Shortall's resignation, yet to read this you'd think she left because Reilly wasn't supporting her!
  • "However, despite budget cuts, the health service has shown remarkable improvements during his time!" - eh... no!
  • "There has also been a sharp decline in long waiting lists." - achieved by massive spin of the figures!

This article currently reads like an election leaflet! BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 22:12, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James Reilly (Irish politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:39, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on James Reilly (Irish politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:42, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:James_Reilly_(Irish_politician)&oldid=1202761546"