This article was nominated for deletion on 30 September 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This may not be the best-formatted article, as it is my first. However, I think that it is necessary because while Smith holds the title of Associate Professor, he is relatively a young scholar with an already impressive body of work. In addition, he is publishing increasingly recognized popular works in his field. - the originator of the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greendayz (talk • contribs) 09:38, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but I don't think it is notable. We'll see. MER-C 09:53, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'll base my argument for notability first on the fact that a Google search for Radical Orthodoxy [1] shows that he is probably the foremost North American popularizer of Radical Orthodoxy. While he may not technically fit the notability guidelines, as he did not invent Radical Orthodoxy itself, I think that he is obviously one of its major figures, if not the North American inventor of the theology.
Secondly, this book review [2] in Christianity Today demonstrates Smith's role in popularizing Radical Orthodoxy specifically in North American Evangelicalism.--Greendayz 00:09, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think James KA Smith is an important figure[edit]
I think James KA Smith is worthy of a wikipedia entry. Although he's young, he's already a prolific author and a well-known figure in American continental philosophy circles as well as a well-known figure in many theology circles. Calvin College is one of the premier institutions for undergraduate philosophy study and holding a professorship there is nothing to sneeze at. Smith is noteable and has a bright future ahead of him.-- Hay4 — Preceding unsigned comment added by West6557 (talk • contribs) 07:18, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the subject's publishing history appear to be impressive. However, the text of the article is nothing but vague postmodern generalities. Will someone who knows the subject please do a re-write? Thanks! Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk) 00:11, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
