Talk:Jaintia Kingdom

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Former countries Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Orphaned references in Jaintia Kingdom[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Jaintia Kingdom's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "heads":

From Gour Kingdom: E M Lewis (1868). "Sylhet District". Principal Heads of the History and Statistics of the Dacca Division. Calcutta: Calcutta Central Press Company. p. 290.
From History of Sylhet: E M Lewis (1868). "Sylhet District". Principal Heads of the History and Statistics of the Dacca Division. Calcutta: Calcutta Central Press Company. pp. 281–326.
From Sylhet region: E M Lewis (1868). "Sylhet District". Principal Heads of the History and Statistics of the Dacca Division. Calcutta: Calcutta Central Press Company. pp. 281–326.

Reference named "allen":

From Gowainghat Upazila: B C Allen (1905). Assam District Gazetteers. Vol. 2. Calcutta: Government of Assam.
From Gour Govinda: B C Allen (1905). Assam District Gazetteers. Vol. 2. Calcutta: Government of Assam. pp. 23–24.
From Sylhet region: B C Allen (1905). Assam District Gazetteers. Vol. 2. Calcutta: Government of Assam.
From History of Sylhet: B C Allen (1905). Assam District Gazetteers. Vol. 2. Calcutta: Government of Assam.
From Conquest of Sylhet: B C Allen (1905). Assam District Gazetteers. Vol. 1. Shillong: Government of Assam. p. 58.
From Laur Kingdom: B C Allen (1905). Assam District Gazetteers. Vol. 2. Calcutta: Government of Assam. pp. 21-62.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:40, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Major political powers in Assam in early sixteenth century.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:52, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extent[edit]

In the Extent section, it says the following:

"The Jaintia Kingdom extended from the east of the Shillong Plateau of present-day Meghalaya in north-east India, into the plains to the south, and north to the Barak River valley in Assam, India."

However, geographically that makes no sense, specifically that last part about the Barak river. The Barak is to the south of the Shillong Plateau.

I wanted to make sure this was a typo before I went and corrected it.

Bytor (talk) Bytor (talk) 20:22, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]