Talk:Jacob Rakkah

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Page name[edit]

Should the surname be spelled Rakah, Rakkah, Raqah, or Raccah (as the subject's modern-day cousin, a notable historian, spells it?). (This will also influence the spelling of Mas'ud Hai Rakah.) Also, should the first name be Anglicized as Jacob? Yoninah (talk) 22:13, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure whether a rarely encountered Romanization or a 'standardized' scholarly one should be used for the page's name; in any case, both should be mentioned in the lead. "Rok(e)ach" is simply a mistake and, at best, should be relegated to a footnote—are there any high-quality sources that use it? Note that an academic transcription, using a 'q' to represent the ק‎, is problematic in this case, as some Raccahs of Libya (though not including the subject's known relatives) spelled their name רכאח‎.
As for the subject's given name, my personal preference is that standard English equivalents should be used for common Hebrew names, as I think they are in scholarly publications. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) 20:23, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I don't understand. Do you advocate any spelling for the surname? Yoninah (talk) 21:18, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In short: Ra(c/cc/k/kk/q/qq)a(h/ḥ), I don't care which, though Rakkaḥ or Raccah is probably the best choice (used, for example, by the respectable-looking A History of the Jews in North Africa. הסרפד (call me Hasirpad) 21:53, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Since "Raccah" is only used in this source and by the modern-day historian, I suggest going with "Rakkah", which I've seen in other scholarly sources. Yoninah (talk) 21:56, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Yoninah (talk) 09:55, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jacob Rakkah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:32, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]