Talk:Itō clan

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 01:45, May 17, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Untitled[edit]

Tadakuni, I noticed that you stated the Saga brothers as being entirely disconnected from the Ito clan, but the reference had provided evidence that a certain Ito no Sukechika formed very detrimental relations with the Kamakura Bakufu and was subsequently ordered to be killed by Yoritomo. This is the only information that had been stated within this reference, and it seemed to be relatively scattered than anything else, so I can't see it as having been the main topic of study for such a book but something regardlessly reliable.

And for the case involving the combination of your edits to my original information stated on the Ito clan was a counter-measure to ensure that vital information was not lost in consequence to over-generalization, considering that you had only made two additional claims, and obviously I'm not going to sacrifice all the claims that I had constructed for the sake of poorly distributed substitutes, no matter how more favorable it may be seen to the eyes of one such as Wikipedia. User:Exiled Ambition March 1 2008 (EST)

User:Exiled Ambition- Please comment on my talk page if you want to discuss this. That, I feel, would be the appropriate forum for taking up such an issue. Secondly, if you say that this source is so vital, why not insert page citations? It would go a long way to reducing the number of times your articles get tagged. Furthermore, my reaction was an instinctive one, since your articles are so full of "conjecture" and "hypothesis." If you put a page citation or two in the article, it would help a lot, not only for me but for other editors as well, such as User:HelloAnnyong, who keeps tagging your articles. Let me once again indicate my thanks to you for carrying on with new article creations at such a regular rate, and my hopes that you will continue to improve. -Tadakuni (talk) 20:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I first of all give my regard to you for cooperating with my present demand, and I suppose citing sources would prove of more benefit when considering the unreasonableness of people such as Annyong, who unconditionally tag my articles even if the information within my references justifies any such claim that I make. In consideration to this, I will take your word, Tadakuni, and I equally allow my praise for each article that you have created up to this point. User:Exiled Ambition March 2 2008 (EST)

User:Exiled Ambition- I will carry this discussion on at your talk page. Thank you. -Tadakuni (talk) 01:52, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]