Talk:Into the Dalek

Doctor Who Mid‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Start‑class Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

45 minutes or 76 minutes?[edit]

This source says that the episode will be 45 minutes long, while this source says it will be an hour and 16 minutes long. The latter might be an error of some sort, since it's the same length they report "Deep Breath" to have [1]. Which length should we go with in the article? G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 12:35, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Go with the first source. I do believe it is an error. Tomorrow we can check the timeslot on the online guide. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 19:30, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Into The Dalek writer: Peter Capaldi's Doctor was written like a "raging Billy Connolly". G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 14:18, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"You are a good Dalek"[edit]

Any relation to the episode "Dalek", in which the Dalek told the Doctor, "You would make a good Dalek"? Or am I just "trainspotting"? –anemone projectors– 21:57, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, a number of reviews I've seen have drawn the connection. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 22:16, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh that's good to hear, and I'm pleased it's mentioned in the article now. –anemone projectors– 17:00, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Two-faced or Half-faced?[edit]

The same character is referred to in different paragraphs by two different names. Is there an official name? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.193.200.237 (talk) 12:09, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's "Half-faced". --User J Dalek 01:49, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image[edit]

How about a snapshot of the scene where the Doctor has his back to the camera whilst standing in front of the Dalek mutant. Or a snapshot of the moment the Dalek sees into the Doctor's memory and soul and finds hatred, where Capaldi is staring into the camera and scenes from Journey's End play behind him? User:90.198.11.152 7 September 2014.

How would that help the reader understand the prose of the article better? (As per my understanding of image policies.) DonQuixote (talk) 16:27, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, there's no real image/screenshot that I can see being justified here, no given shot/makeup/etc was noted of any particular interest, and we've got pictures of the Doctor and Daleks elsewhere. (Contrast this to the Half-Face Man frmo the previous ep, where there was commentary on the make up/SFX used on that. --MASEM (t) 19:44, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How about this image. It shows off the special effects and shows what the story is about. http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20140831044722/tardis/images/thumb/c/c6/Shrunken_Twelve_at_eye_level_with_Rusty.jpg/250px-Shrunken_Twelve_at_eye_level_with_Rusty.jpg User:90.209.62.21 14 September 2014.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Into the Dalek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140904111206/http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/09/03/saturday-cable-ratings-college-football-wins-night-doctor-who-sportscenter-attack-on-titan-more/298972/ to http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2014/09/03/saturday-cable-ratings-college-football-wins-night-doctor-who-sportscenter-attack-on-titan-more/298972/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:30, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]