Talk:Institute for Legislative Analysis
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 14 May 2024. The result of the discussion was soft delete. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
ORGIND[edit]
Politicalorganizationjunkie, you said in your RFU request that there were sources meeting ORGIND that no one refuted
, bringing up the Washington Examiner article, which I assume is the one on Haley. Which part of that did you believe met ORGIND exactly? The first paragraph, which says Haley got a score, the second, which says what score she got, or the rest of it, which is something like 90% quotes?
If you're referring to some other Examiner article, I would recommend adding them to this article in draft before publication. Or if you'd prefer, we can look at where to go to "refute anything". Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:03, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Alpha3031, apologies if that came across as demeaning, that was not my intention and was thinking I had addressed the issues. I think I now have a better understanding from where you are coming from. I will do some research and try to find and cite more of this type of articles like I utilized in the criticism section - https://www.gillettenewsrecord.com/news/wyoming/article_17db6053-4975-5b50-b1e0-3fe3ef4e4317.html. Politicalorganizationjunkie (talk) 15:29, 24 May 2024 (UTC)