Talk:Insane Clown Posse discography

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Insane Clown Posse discography article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Discographies Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of the Discographies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's collection of discography articles and lists. If you would like to participate please visit the project page. Any questions pertaining to discography-related articles should be directed to the project's talk page.DiscographiesWikipedia:WikiProject DiscographiesTemplate:WikiProject DiscographiesDiscography articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Hip hop

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Psychopathic Records (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychopathic Records, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Psychopathic RecordsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychopathic RecordsTemplate:WikiProject Psychopathic RecordsPsychopathic Records articles

Promote this discography[edit]

{{rfctag}} I propose that this discography be promoted to B-Class because contributors have added a great amount of information since it was graded as Stub-Class. However, it is missing chart positions fro countries other than US, which is something that needs to be improved. Doomsdayer520 (talk) 13:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I'm new to project work and I'm not sure if I drew attention to this proposal properly. Is there a way to make a request for comment only toward members of a certain project? In this case, the Discography project? Please let me know if I should have used a different procedure. Doomsdayer520 (talk)

I've turned off the RfC for you, because it's unnecessary. All you need to do is leave a friendly note at the project's talk page, e.g., Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Discographies, and ask them to reassess the article. Different projects use somewhat different standards, as you can see by clicking the "quality scale" links above.

WP Discography may invite you to assess the article yourself; some projects are quite happy to have new editors helping with that task. If so, then I suggest reading a bit about the scale that they're using, and ask them how they choose to handle lists. (Some tag lists as lists, and some, like WP:MILHIST, use the same A-B-C-Start-Stub scale for lists as they do for regular articles.) WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:26, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was curious as to why there was not a comprehensive list of all the yearly Halloween tracks and where I could find one.

The Mighty Death Pop![edit]

The album sales figure is misleading since they sold 41,000 in the first week: [1]. I'm going to remove that number to have the quadrant remain blank until an updated number is sourced. Evenrød (talk) 08:13, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Insane Clown Posse discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:59, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]