Talk:Independent Safeguarding Authority

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Northern Ireland Low‑importance

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Edits to Vetting and Barring Scheme Section[edit]

Apologies, I forgot to add comment on my change of 21:16, September 16, 2009, to the Vetting and Barring Scheme section. I thought the tone did not display a neutral point of view as all the sources quoted were highly critical of the Scheme. The changes I have made are to reference the source material and the legal basis. I would be interested to hear others views. Perhaps adding a critism of the ISA/VBS section? Tybers (talk) 23:26, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Exemptions from ISA registration[edit]

Would be interested to see anyone else's contribution to this topic, since it has flared up in the media recently. The information I've submitted comes from the e-book Tutoring: The Complete Guide

Tutor Expert (talk) 19:13, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am a bit uncomfortable with your use of a quote from a DCSF civil servant. Current convention under the FOI and the DPA is not to individually name any civil servants below the Senior Civil Service, i.e. only Grade 5s and above should be named. However, as the policy has been publicly confirmed in the Formal response to the 2007/08 consultation, I have changed it from the specific to the general although I have retained tutors as an example. Hope this does not change the orginal meaning Tybers (talk) 22:55, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Independent Safeguarding Authority. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Independent Safeguarding Authority. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081225004302/http://police.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/operational-policing/bichard-inquiry-report?view=Binary to http://police.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/operational-policing/bichard-inquiry-report?view=Binary

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]