Talk:Inca Mummies: Secrets of a Lost World

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Peru

This article is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.PeruWikipedia:WikiProject PeruTemplate:WikiProject PeruPeru articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Peru To-do:

Assess and prioritise articles (log)
Check for copyvios at Special:Contributions/Priscilla D, tag as {{Db-copyvio}} where appropriate
Create:
Expand: new articles; top importance articles
FAC / FLC: Peru national football team
GAN:
Merge requests: Amazonas before the Inca Empire, Chachapoyas culture
Review: Shining Path, Universitario de Deportes
Translate: National University of San Marcos
Work on Lima, the current article improvement drive
Wikify: articles needing attention

Wikipedia Ambassador Program assignment[edit]

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Mount Allison University supported by Anthropology and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

Above message substituted from {{WAP assignment}} on 14:13, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

I agree with the previous comment regarding the summary and how the archaeologist background legitimacy to the article. The page is well put together and supported. The only additions I may suggest would be images for visual aids as well as potentially a link to a youtube trailer. Tnadolny (talk) 18:36, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review[edit]

This article provides a good summary of the documentary. Highlighting and providing more information on the archaeologist in the film allows for validation of the legitimacy of the work and information portrayed in the documentary, as does the information on the area being studied. Varied sources provide further legitimacy to the article overall.

Saunderhill (talk) 21:21, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]