Talk:Ich bin vergnügt mit meinem Glücke, BWV 84

Ich bin vergnügt mit meinem Glücke, BWV 84 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 2, 2016. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Ich bin vergnügt mit meinem Glücke, BWV 84 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 February 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the 1727 Bach cantata for a solo soprano Ich bin vergnügt mit meinem Glücke, BWV 84, one of few works Bach named "Cantata" himself, shows the spirit of the beginning Enlightenment?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ich bin vergnügt mit meinem Glücke, BWV 84.

Wikipedia

Classical music: Compositions

	Classical music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
	This article is supported by Compositions task force.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ich bin vergnügt mit meinem Glücke, BWV 84/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 09:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to take this on. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 09:15, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Can we say something like (German for "I am content in my good fortune") in the lead, and also in similar cases in the main article?

compare BWV 65 --GA

Fine, if it is not the norm, no need. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 07:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would be good to add "composer" or perhaps "German composer" before Bach.

compare BWV 65 --GA

Fine, if it is not the norm, no need. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 07:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

and Bach led the first performance Remove "Bach", appears redundant.

yes --GA

Can "elegiac" be linked?

yes --GA

he wrote also this text appears a bit confusing. The line cold be rephrased as The text is similar to a cantata text Ich bin vergnügt mit meinem Stande (I am content with my position), published by Picander in 1728; however, it is not certain that he wrote both the texts.

that is in more detail below, I changed "this text" to "the cantata text"

History and words

You may wish to repeat the links from the lead in the main article.

I hesitate to link Leipzig, for example, because its well known, plus the present-day city has little in common with the one at Bach's time --GA

Not every link, whichever you think fine. :) Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 07:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BWV 144, in 1724 Comma after 1724.

done --GA

"gospel" may be linked.

would you link bible? --GA

Links really confuse me, even Bible is linked in some articles. Whichever you think fine. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 07:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

in the general way that the Christian should be content with his share of good fortune, without envy of others who may seem more fortunate I am not very sure what it means.

there are many ways of being content, Picander (or whoever the librettist was) deals with this way --GA

Bach led the first performance, probably on 9 February 1727 You say "probably" here, but uncertainty is not implied in the lead.

changed --GA

Would be good to mention the author's name in the image caption.

yes, but it's awfully long and presented right next to the image --GA

Selected recordings

Who is Aryeh Oron? You need to present people.

the author of Bach-Cantatas, but we can do without mentioning him --GA

Not adamant on this, but the mention won't do any harm. Unless it is a well-known personality in this field, the mention of a name like this is often confusing. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 07:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

on the Bach-Cantatas website Perhaps add "official" to this, as there could be many others of the same sort but unofficial?

compare BWV 65

Ignore if it is not an official website. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 07:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Music

"recitative", linked in sections "2" and "4", is a duplink.

done --GA

Rest looks good. Would be glad to promote once the above issues are addressed. Cheers! Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 09:20, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for efficient reading and comments! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:27, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from my side for such a wonderful work! Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 07:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Issues resolved, promoted. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 07:00, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]