Talk:I Admit/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: BMO4744 (talk · contribs) 02:02, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I will be reviewing this article for Good Article status in Music.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written. checkY
    The article is well writen and follows the wp style manual very well. Covers topics in mature manner. No grammar mistakes I can see.
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable. checkY
    All of the references come from good news sources.
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    The article covers both the song and large background behind it in good detail.
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy. checkY
    The subject around the article is prone to bias, but it seems that the editors have kept this bias out of the article.
  1. It is stable.checkY
    We can thank Jimbo that this article has not fallen into the edit wars that other articles around the topic have fallen into. Their are no edit wars in the logs and only 2 undos in the history.
  1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate. checkY
    The article is well illustrated and has a audio sample of the song. Although I would replace the picture of O.J. Simpson with a photo of his book if that is possible.
  1. Overall:
    Pass: checkY

Thank you so much for your review, BMO4744! I would have preferred to use the cover of If I Did It (File:If I did It 2.png or File:If I Did It.jpg) as the image for the Critical reception section, but unfortunately, I don't think it meets Wikipedia's fair use guideline since the book isn't the main subject of the article. — Newslinger talk 20:02, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.