Talk:ITV plc

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Freesat[edit]

Please can Freesat be included in the ITV plc article 86.132.46.227 (talk) 21:54, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:ITV logo.svg[edit]

The image Image:ITV logo.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:35, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

which crown exactly?[edit]

The network, which is currently branded ITV1 by ITV plc, has vied with the British Broadcasting Corporation's BBC One for the status of the UK's most watched channel since the 1950s (a crown it only lost in 2005).

Does the last phrase mean that ITV1 has outdrawn BBC1 every year except 2005? Or that BBC1 has outdrawn ITV1 every year except 2005? Or that either BBC1 or ITV1 has been on top every year except 2005, when some other channel won? Or something else? —Tamfang (talk) 22:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And considering some of the early TV sets may have been single channel only plus it took some years to establish ITV franchises in all regions I'd be surprised if ITV was beating the BBC in its first few years. Timrollpickering (talk) 14:47, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on ITV plc. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on ITV plc. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:42, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ITV plc. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:56, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"ITV5" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ITV5 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 18#ITV5 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 13:52, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noticed something[edit]

Hey, I noticed that the "Diagram displaying consolidation of ITV franchisees into ITV plc" is incorrect, as it says that Carlton existed prior to 1993 and was the only name for the company that served London, when in fact Carlton was the second company to serve London, beginning its service after its predecessor, Thames Television in 1993. I don't know how to edit the table, though, so can someone pleaaase do it? Thanks! Sup3rG33k08 (talk) 09:02, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for spotting that; I've updated the table.
By the way, Carlton was tbe third London weekday franchisee, the first being Associated-Rediffusion.  Dr Greg  talk  11:51, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah yep, thank you! Sup3rG33k08 (talk) 22:38, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

False take-over claims[edit]

Various IPs keeping adding unsourced claims that ITV plc has been acquired by Paramount. These claims are patently false as ITV plc is still listed on the London Stock Exchange. See here. Although ITV plc has licensing agreements in place with Paramount, I can find no reliable source that suggests any takeover bid from Paramount to acquire ITV plc is either imminent or under consideration. Dormskirk (talk) 12:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I note that false takeover claims have now been posted to this article on 13 occasions since the start of the year. I also note that there are similar claims circulating on investor chat rooms and that such speculation could be driving the recent sharp increase in the company's share price. It should be noted that, "knowingly or recklessly spreading false or misleading information about a qualifying investment through the media" may be regarded as market abuse. I have previously made a request for page protection in the hope of trying to stop this. Dormskirk (talk) 18:00, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah this is a total nightmare, other than for financial gain I can see no other reason people are making these false edits. I find it very unlikely that Paramount would be interested in acquiring ITV and even if they were I doubt they could get it past regulators as they already own C5. I am in full agreement that page protection would probably be the best shout to prevent this. Professional Adriazeri (talk) 21:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dormskirk Update, the page has been pending-changes protected. Professional Adriazeri (talk) 22:54, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great. Thanks, Dormskirk (talk) 23:17, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:ITV_plc&oldid=1221112005"