Talk:IRT Ninth Avenue Line

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

untitled[edit]

It seems notable that this "elevated" went through a tunnel (due to the topology) and had subway-like partly-underground stations. As for the opening of this section, [1] says "and was extended to meet the Jerome Ave. IRT in 1918"Jason McHuff 23:20, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This and all articles on the elevateds should be called "El" articles, not IRT articles. This one should be "Ninth Avenue El." They were not commonly known as IRT lines but have come to be known down history as El lines.

Question: there is a famous photo of a journey on the Ninth Ave. El at the Smithsonian website. Can I freeze-frame and copy here? --ScottyBerg (talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by ScottyBerg (talkcontribs) 19:45, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A metro only from 1872[edit]

The first 1868 version was a cable hauled railways between two stations - a railways line, elevated but like many others and not a metro. It became the world's second urban metro in 1972, after the 1863 Metropolitan Railway in London, when more stations were added to the two station line. Metros do not have to be underground. 94.3.125.209 (talk) 10:06, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Original track gauge[edit]

What was the original track gauge? Peter Horn User talk 17:09, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pure nonsense[edit]

The phrase "changed the wheel widths on the rolling stock" makes no sense and should read ""changed the wheel spacing on the axles of the rolling stock". However the problem is that one can not change the spacing of the train wheels on an axle or on the wheel set. The wheels are mounted with a press fit at perhaps 20,000 lb/sq in (1,410 kg/cm2). So, as for moving the wheels on the axle, good luck. One changes the wheel sets or even the trucks. Peter Horn User talk 01:09, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on IRT Ninth Avenue Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:49, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:IRT Lexington Avenue Line which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 06:45, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Opening day discrepancy[edit]

The text body states that the line opened on July 3rd, but the sidebar indicates it opened on July 1st. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elead1 (talkcontribs) 14:38, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]