Talk:IOS 10/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: PiGuy3 (talk · contribs) 03:38, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

Overall this is a well written article.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Spelling and grammar are good, and the article follows WP:MOS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   There are plenty of inline citations, the citations are reliable, and the support the article properly.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   This article covers all of the important facets of iOS 10

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   There may be a slight overemphasis on the positive parts of iOS 10

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   The article could benefit from a few additional images.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   This article meets all of the criteria.