Talk:IMAM Ro.63

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Military history: Aviation / European / Italian / World War II Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War II task force

Mergefrom Meridionali Ro.63[edit]

Why are there two articles for the same aircraft? This one is the better (with it's own problems admittedly),so I endorse a merge from.

Merge - without delay, nobody seems interested so I shall go ahead.Petebutt (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge carried out - very little worth moving.Petebutt (talk) 18:12, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Avis C.4[edit]

I can't find any reference to this aircraft whatsoever.Any body any ideas?Petebutt (talk) 18:25, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Found three photos on flickr

Petebutt (talk) 03:25, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on IMAM Ro.63. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070912032711/http://www.enricopezzi.it/aerei_r.htm to http://www.enricopezzi.it/aerei_r.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]