Talk:Hurricane Fernanda (1993)

Hurricane Fernanda (1993) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 21, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Weather: Tropical / Eastern Pacific Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled[edit]

At least a "C" in my opinion, probably higher. --Dil Hoom Hoom Kare 19:37, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Fernanda (1993)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 20:58, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am reviewing this article. The only problem I find is that ref 13 (used twice in the article) is dead. Otherwise, great job! Xtzou (Talk) 20:58, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
Ref 13 (used twice) is a dead link and is not in the Internet Archive.

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused: }
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Just needs the ref fixed. Xtzou (Talk) 20:58, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed the dead linked. Mm40 (talk) 21:21, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking care of that. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:16, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Article passes. Xtzou (Talk) 16:39, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]