Talk:Hudson–Bergen Light Rail

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

04/05/06 Edit[edit]

Edited the paragraph on MOS3 and further expansion as it was inaccurate based on current information that can be found on NJ Transit's website. The information there now reflects the current situation.

Colored text[edit]

Is the coloured text really necessary? The yellow and blue text is difficult to read on a computer screen. Darkcore 05:35, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is it necessary, no. Colored text had been used in previous versions of the page to describe the previous route system. The new route pattern effective February 11, 2006, uses yellow, green and turquoise on the route maps to distinguish between the three routes. While it isn't ideal for the eye (black text on a white background would provide optimal contrast), the use of text in the corresponding route colors does serve to emphasize the routes available at each individual station. Any suggestions for an alternative means to differentiate between the three routes in another manner? The station sequence boxes at the bottom of the pages for individual stations use the color coding in boxes to the left and right of the route. Take a look at any of the pages (other than the five stations on the Bayonne branch, which are incomplete for now) for an example of one possible technique. Alansohn 05:56, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I made the new map for this article, so I'm familiar with the new route pattern. We had a similar discussion regarding the Port Authority Trans-Hudson article, which also uses colours to differentiate route lines. For that article, we created different articles for each line (i.e., there would be West Side Avenue-Tonnelle Avenue (HBLR line), 22nd Street-Hoboken Terminal (HBLR line), Hoboken Terminal-Tonnelle Avenue (HBLR line) articles, and they would be linked to within the main HBLR article). This allows you to differentiate between the three routes, and people can click on the line link if they want more information about that particular line. We only used colours for the station infoboxes. Darkcore 13:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It would certainly be possible to pull out the details and create separate articles for each of the three routes. To me, the downside of that approach is that there is so much overlap between the routes and that these routes don't have to much of a separate identity. These aren't three separate spokes that intersect at a point or two, they're basically three strands of a rope that uncoils a bit at each end. Another alternative might be to put a colored box preceding and / or following the route name,and keep the route name in black. I'll think this through further, but I think that the number of stations is samll enough that we should try for now to keep the in one place, and focus on a means of presenting the data in a meaningful manner. Alansohn 15:43, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New template for station articles to replace rail line[edit]

Hi all, just wanted to tell you that we have a NJT-specific template for using on the station articles; it's {{NJT rail line}}. If you go to the template talk page, it has very detailed instructions on how to use it. Take a look at a sample edit (for terminal stations) to see how to convert the rail line template into the NJT rail line one. lensovet 22:09, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that s-rail/line was standard, why has it been changed? Geoking66talk 05:25, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
{{s-rail}} is newer and is meant to replace all the smaller templates like {{NJT line}}. I don't know if the necessary preparation work has been done for the NJT system yet. --CComMack (t–c) 19:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
S-rail and S-line are in use on NJT commuter lines. I've tried and failed at getting s-rail and s-line to work for the HBLR, even though I've been able to get it to work on other systems. Geoking66talk 08:58, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. I'll be putting all of the station templates into s-line. Geoking66talk 00:57, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Honor System?[edit]

I don't think it's accurate to say that HBLR operates on an honor system if ticket inspectors perform random checks. Peaceduck (talk) 19:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Trust, but verify." A search of the New York Times finds an article that calls it "a proof of purchase system, a kind of honor system where a rider will be required to show a ticket if asked.", which more accurately reflects the reality. I will reflect it in the article. Alansohn (talk) 20:15, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:NJT Arrows III ALP-44.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:NJT Arrows III ALP-44.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:11, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/hudson/
    Triggered by \brailway-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 09:17, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bike trail along Hoboken Terminal-Tonnelle Avenue section[edit]

What's with the bike trail along the Hoboken Terminal — Tonnelle Avenue segment between Second Street and Lincoln Harbor Stations? It looks like something you could add to the station articles. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 15:29, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is a path connecting to 2nd Street station discussed at Hudson–Bergen Light Rail#18th Street, Jersey City which needs updating. (http://www.nj.com/hudson/index.ssf/2013/11/4m_nj_transit_walkway_nearing_completion.html) and there is a path from in Weehawken south of Lincoln Harbor near Weehawken Cove, but they are not connected. A path walkway runs north from Hoboken Terminal to 4th and then along the river to Weehawken, but not parallel to the HBLR.Djflem (talk) 21:43, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Length[edit]

Network length (transport) describes the various ways a rail line length can be counted. The HBLR article has used a route length of 21 mi (33.8 km) to describe the total length of the miles covered by the HBLR network from terminal to terminal. Seems this is the most broadly understood. To use track length 34 mi (54.7 km) in the opening gives another impression of the extent of the system. It is confusing since the extension to Bayonne 8th Street is a single track, making the unref'd info box 17 mi (27.4 km) line length wrong. Djflem (talk) 05:31, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hudson–Bergen Light Rail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Hudson–Bergen Light Rail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jersey Avenue Station/Template issue[edit]

I wanted to flag that the link for Jersey Avenue in the map directs to a New Jersey Transit station in New Brunswick, not the HBLR station. I would change this myself, but I have absolutely zero idea how templates work. Butterboy (talk) 20:07, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hudson–Bergen_Light_Rail&oldid=1207661383"