Talk:How to Suppress Women's Writing

Human rights Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gender studies Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Domestic violence in lesbian relationships · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

Feminism Mid‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Editing[edit]

I agree with Julian. Very well done! I imagine that this page was nonexistent before your additions so kudos. Here are the edits that I noticed:

-Did a minor edit by adding "and" haha

-You mention "it explains how women and minorities are prevented from producing written works," however, you never mention minorities anywhere else throughout the wiki page. It is unclear whether you are referring to women as minorities (which is true) or how I think most people will read it as racial minorities. In which case you don't talk anything about minorities. I recommend you either delete that or you relate the "methods" (at least some of them) to minorities.

-The background section should be moved before the methods section. Seems to read more chronologically/logically for readers.

-Your first paragraph has a lot of great information yet no support or citations. I see one after the first sentence. Can you find citations for the information on paintings, authors, or style? I think it would bolster your argument.

-Also I would encourage you to add to the reception section. It seems very brief, granted, I know it is difficult to find more information but that is an area to think of improving.

Also, love the photo. Hope this helps! Great work Austin and Kim!!!

CPBoyer (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:59, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyediting? I guess. I don't know[edit]

Great job! Keep it on fighting the good fight.

A couple of notes:

"Although primarily focusing on texts written in English, the author also includes examples from non-English works as well as paintings" feels a little awkward. Paintings feels like it was tacked on at the end.

"Russ aims to describe the systematic social forces that fight female authors" It seems like the female authors should fight the systematic social forces not the other way around. "Oppress" maybe?

The title "Methods" is a little confusing, however I'm not sure how to fix. "Methods" might suggest the various writing methods that Russ employed to write the book, although if you read the section, it is quite clear what Methods mean in this context. I'm not sure how to change it or if you even need to.

I don't think you need a "Background" section. I think you could probably put that information in the header.

Great job with the grammar and such. Although I am terrible at punctuation and spelling, it seems that you didn't make any mistakes. Take that with a grain of salt, though. Jmwisebird (talk) 03:26, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]