Talk:How Doth the Little Crocodile (Carrington)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Title[edit]

@Another Believer: Hi again. I'm investigating this sculpture and I have found that English-language sources use the English name consistently. Do you think it should be moved to How Doth the Little Crocodile (Carrington) or How Doth the Little Crocodile (sculpture)? (CC) Tbhotch 21:35, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tbhotch, WP:VAMOS says, "If the title is not very specific, or refers to a common subject, add the surname of the artist in parentheses afterwards, e.g. Reading the Letter (Picasso). It is generally better to disambiguate by the artist's name than by medium, as there may be other paintings or sculptures of the same name by other artists." If you're aware of any other artworks called "How Doth the Little Crocodile", then How Doth the Little Crocodile (Carrington) may be better, but if not, I have no problem with How Doth the Little Crocodile (sculpture). Thanks for expanding the article! ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:16, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, the move to How Doth the Little Crocodile (Carrington) makes more sense since a painting is being described as well. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:44, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk) 07:58, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How Doth the Little Crocodile
How Doth the Little Crocodile

5x expanded by Tbhotch (talk). Self-nominated at 23:10, 8 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • Hi Tbhotch, review follows: article more than 5x expanded from 8 June; article exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline to reliable sources throughout; I didn't spot any overly close paraphrasing and the quote is properly attributed; hook fact is interesting, mentioned in the article and backed up by the source cited; I'm not an expert on freedom of panorama in Mexico but the image appears to have an acceptable license; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks fine to me - Dumelow (talk) 08:04, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]