Talk:Horses in warfare

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Horses in warfare. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.horsepull.com/Record%20Loads.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.allempires.com/article/index.php?q=Central_Asia
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080827181403/http://www.qmfound.com/horse.htm to http://www.qmfound.com/horse.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.army.forces.gc.ca/gghg/regiment/cavalry-cavalerie-eng.asp
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.militaryhorse.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Horses in warfare. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080515133147/http://www.aerc.org/AERC_Rider_Handbook110303.asp to http://aerc.org/AERC_Rider_Handbook110303.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080821184002/http://www.ams-museum.org.uk/historyRAVC.htm to http://www.ams-museum.org.uk/historyRAVC.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513003817/http://www.nwhsar.org/pages/whyhorseback.html to http://www.nwhsar.org/pages/whyhorseback.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1066country.com/hastings/events/hastingsweek/battle.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:43, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Amendment and citation needed

Under "Medieval," the following is stated as fact (without citation), but is in fact a highly disputed issue:

"The medieval war horse was of moderate size, rarely exceeding 15.2 hands (62 inches, 157 cm)."

A more balanced statement, acknowledging that there are opposing views, is needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.221.111.164 (talk) 22:45, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

For recent work that may provide a useful supporting reference, see https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oa.3038

This academic blog post from the Medieval Warhorse project at Exeter University summarises the findings https://medievalwarhorse.exeter.ac.uk/2022/07/09/the-size-of-a-warhorse/

Monstrelet (talk) 09:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

This issue was thoroughly discussed and debated at the time, across several different talk pages. At the time, the discussion was debunking the myth that war horses were big draft horses. So really, it’s not a “opposing” view that some horses were even smaller than 15-15.2. That said, If the blog linked to an actual academic study, that would be a useful citation to add, but for an article of this quality, we can’t just cite blog posts. Montanabw^(talk) 18:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

The blog indeed links to a proper academic study - I pulled the link out intending to make it more obvious but sadly failed to do so successfully, for which I apologise. And I included it because it actually supports the view warhorses were "rarely exceeding 15.2 hands" (though it uses metric measurement), not because it was an opposing view. Monstrelet (talk) 10:40, 26 April 2023 (UTC)