Talk:Hong Kong mainland China driving scheme

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Hong Kong Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (25)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (58) • B-Class articles (284)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (998)

Image needed (344)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,341) • Stub-Class articles (6,690)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (402) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,258)

One-sided article[edit]

Currently this article is quite one-sided, only detailing the opposition side and not mentioning other views. The common arguments from the opposition sides themselves barely make sense:

"mainlanders will pollute the city" - isn't HK already polluted to death?
"mainlanders will clog the roads" - aren't HK roads already clogged? (keep in mind that the mainland ad hoc quota is 50 per day, in other words, "spitting in an ocean of spit")
"mainlanders drive dangerously" - and HK drivers aren't dangerous, horrible drivers?
"mainlanders use different road rules" - incoming mainlanders need to pass a test.

The article currently only seems to give off a "this is bad, look at all these people protesting" vibe. The HK and Guangdong authorities have given press releases citing accident rate figures and the likes which refute the concerns - certainly there should be detailed mention of those as well. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 17:45, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hong Kong mainland China driving scheme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:23, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]