Talk:Homer's Night Out

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHomer's Night Out has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHomer's Night Out is part of the The Simpsons (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 16, 2008Good article nomineeListed
September 26, 2008Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Homer's Night Out/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi, I will be reviewing your article, Homer's Night Out. It looks very good. There is a typo that I'll just fix myself. I will be posting further comments here.Please feel free to contact me. —Mattisse (Talk) 20:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Bart wanders into the room" - this is another room than the restaurant, I take it, a party room of some sort? This part is a little vague for someone unfamiliar with the episode.
  • Since you describe the costumes of the "showgirls" under Production (and have a still of a costume), it would be better if you described their presence in the plot more clearly.
Otherwise, the article seems to fulfill the criteria for GA. I will give a full review when you respond. —Mattisse (Talk) 21:10, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I have made some edits now, let me know what you think! =) TheLeftorium 06:33, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fineal GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
I am pleased to pass this article for GA. —Mattisse (Talk) 15:42, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome, thanks! BTW, I noticed that in the ratings paragraph the date says "19-25 March March 1990", shouldn't it be "19-25 March 1990"? TheLeftorium 15:47, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Sometimes the script screws up. I check it visually but don't always catch everything. It needs to be corrected. —Mattisse (Talk) 16:02, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Homer's Night Out. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]