Talk:Holt tractor

Military history: Technology / British / European / North America / United States / World War I C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War I task force

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merger proposal[edit]

The Holt gas electric tank was a one-off prototype that never entered production. While notable as the very first prototype of a U.S. tank, there doesn't appear to be sufficient information to justify a stand-alone article. I recommend merging it with Holt tractors. -- btphelps ^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:26, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are quite a lot of short articles on Wikipedia, and this one is already longer than a stub, although I acknowledge that extending it significantly might be difficult.

I would oppose merger on several counts. Firstly, although made by Holt and (apparently) sharing some components with the Holt tractor, it was sufficiently different from those machines to sit very awkwardly in that article.

(My view of Holt tractor is that it should cover the type pictured, and related variations -- hence early steam-powered models would only be covered in passing (perhaps) and later models would be covered elsewhere.)

Secondly, there are numerous categories that apply to the gas tank but don't apply to the general tractors; merging would make categorisation messy.

Thirdly, it is quite common for significant vehicle types, machines, etc to have their own articles, and this one is notable enough to support that.

EdJogg (talk) 10:08, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]