Talk:Hog Island (San Joaquin County)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 20:51, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Comments

  • Lead at one sentence is not an adequate summary of the article, even if it is a short article.
    • Green checkmarkY Fixed.
  • "USGS aerial imagery of Hog Island." fragment, no full stop.
    • Green checkmarkY Fixed.
  • "district.[2][3]. " remove second full stop.
    • Green checkmarkY Fixed.
  • "are often discussed simultaneously" what does that mean?
    • Green checkmarkY Fixed.
  • "100 miles" convert.
    • Green checkmarkY Fixed.
  • "60 miles northwest" likewise.
    • Green checkmarkY Fixed.
  • "a 1910 USGS map" spell it out first time.
    • Green checkmarkY Fixed.
  • "in 1914.[14] A 1923 " repetitive.
    • Green checkmarkY Fixed.
  • "In 2007, the owners" ... and fourteen years later...?
    • Gray check markYg Added some information from 2011 (and at least something about the island from 2016), but information about the camping venue was surprisingly hard to track down; even county planning documents and parcel information didn't really say much.
  • Highest elevation appears in infobox but not in text, could add a sentence for that.
    • Green checkmarkY Fixed.
  • Still marked as a stub which it patently is not.
    • Green checkmarkY Fixed.
  • Be consistent, some of your online sources have access dates, others don't.
    • Green checkmarkY Fixed.

That's it for now. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 07:52, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Taking a crack at this now. I will deposit whatever random links I find on the talk page, in the hopes of turning up something later than 2007. jp×g 08:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I have found a couple of links, but nothing especially promising (the last word anyone had on those development plans seems to have been in 2011). I will try to incorporate those; the rest of the stuff is copyediting, which I can do quickly. jp×g 09:40, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@The Rambling Man: I've gotten around to it, what do you think? jp×g 07:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]