Talk:Hladnikia

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Slovenia Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Slovenia to-do list:

Here are some tasks you can do (watch):

Requests: Jože Tisnikar (sl), Protestant Reformation in the Slovene Lands (sl), Metlika black (sl)
Wikify: Russia–Slovenia relations
Unreferenced: Inner Carniola, Litostroj, Pavel Golia, Predjama Castle
Cleanup: Edvard Ravnikar, Škofja Loka, Inex-Adria Aviopromet Flight 1308
Expand: Education in Slovenia
Stubs: Ajdovi žganci, Čop Street, Omar Naber, Radenska
NPOV: Gregorij Rožman, Siddharta (band)
Portal maintenance: Update News, Did you know, announcements, and suggest Selected article and picture
Help assess the quality of 63 unassessed articles
Take/Add requested photographs

Merging Hladnikia pastinacifolia into Hladnikia article[edit]

Don't merge – I don't agree with merge proposal. Hladnikia article should focus on evolutionary history view, genus placement in higher taxonomic ranks (eg. tribe, subfamily and especially family), appropriate cladogram and some debate about possible existence of more than just one species in this genus (some authors do list more than just H. pastinacifolia in Hladnikia genus, while others - especially Slovenian - support monotypic genus and placement of other species in separate genus, Grafia). Describing the species itself, its habitat, distribution and conservation in genus article seems non practical to me.--Melaleuca alternifolia | talk 08:12, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agree - If the genus is just a monotypic genus - one article can cover both genus and species. 2 articles is a waste of space and effort - especially for a low class species/genus. DavidAnstiss (talk) 01:40, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, given that the current recognized position is that this is a monotypic genus, and we shouldn't use crystal ball arguments about how classifications might change. The articles are small enough to merge and still have a short article; splits are always possible if articles grow too large (which seems exceeding unlikely in this case). Klbrain (talk) 10:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, apparently I forgot about this merge proposal. Since I've noticed it is customary on English Wikipedia to deal with monotypic taxa in a single article, I have changed my opinion and consequently agree with the proposition. I will merge the articles, someone familiar with closing mergers please do the closing part.--Melaleuca alternifolia | talk 10:57, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]