Talk:History of the Australian Army

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bouganville[edit]

I couldnt find any mention of peacekeeping in Bouganville, did i miss it? if it definatley isnt there could someone who knows about it write about it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.4.74.65 (talk) 19:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC). I walked with my 8 year old son in Newcastle's Civic park this afternoon and looked at a war memorial commemorating the sacrifies made by our servicemen in the Malay, Malay pennisula, Borneo and Korea conflicts. All of which I know very little. I looked here as my first reference point and I find very little other than headings?? Surely there must be Historians with an interest for this period. Regards Gary Jenness (Newie resident I'm in the book) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.68.123.252 (talk) 12:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AMTG.jpg[edit]

Image:AMTG.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested Sectioning[edit]

I think the first section should be broken up into pre-federation 'colonial forces section' and a section up to WWII. Also the post WWII section could be broken up into a SEA section (Malaya Emergency, Vietnam War) and a Modern period eg. Gulf War 1, East Timor onwards. I haven't thought through the exact names but I think this would provide additional structure to the article. Comments and suggestion welcomed. --TinTin (talk) 23:37, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Grey in the Centenary history of the Australian Army has eight chapters: Federation to 1914, 1914-1918, 1919-1939, 1939-1941, 1942-1945, 1945-1959, 1960-1975 and 1976-2000. We can add since 2001. The focus should not be on operations but on the structure of the Australian Army in peacetime and on support for operations in wartime. Anthony Staunton (talk) 04:56, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of the Australian Army. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1919-1939[edit]

The first sentence in this section 'After the end of the First World War, the Australian Army dramatically cut back on its standing forces. There was still a large pool of volunteers to choose from, and due to the Great Depression vacancies were quickly filled, as they were steady, relatively well paying jobs' needs a rewrite. The Australian Army did not dramatically cut back on its standing forces. What is did do in 1920 was disband the wartime special force, the Australian Imperial Force, and rebuild and reorganise the full time Australian Permanent Force and the part time Citizen Military Force (aka Militia) which contained all the infantry and light horse units. The Depression saw the Australian Army reduced with the end of conscription and the reduction of both Permanent and Citizen force personnel. I am not sure but I assume that service wages were cut during the depression. Because the standing army did not have either infantry of light horse, soldiers enlisted for the 1937 Coronation Contingent were all members of the Royal Australian Artillery. Anthony Staunton (talk) 14:00, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Anthony Staunton: G'day, Anthony, agreed. Unfortunately I don't have much energy for Wikipedia at the moment (new posting, and general malaise), but I have tried to rework it a little. If you think it needs further work, please feel free to tweak it. Additionally, do you have a ref for the 1937 contingent information? I had only had a quick look, but couldn't find anything at this stage. Sorry. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 09:15, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]