Talk:History of online games

Video games Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Cake Mania (series) (0 participants)
Omocat (4 participants)
Fortnite Chapter 5 Season 2: Myths and Mortals (9 participants)
SpongeBob SquarePants (disambiguation) (9 participants)
Stick Soldiers (2 participants)
Rick Jay Glen (4 participants; relisted)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (16 participants; relisted)
Atlus USA (15 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

The premise[edit]

"Online games are currently considered a separate industry of video games" (Current intro)

Are they? Historically, they have been, but I would say that today there are some distinct industries that revolve around online gaming (e.g. MMOs, casual/social games) but "online games" are not, in themselves, an entirely separate industry. This article is in need of some serious taxonomy cleanup. --Spacehedgehog (talk) 06:25, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

notes on initial creation[edit]

I may have bitten off more than I can chew here; the article is pretty big and contains no summary of the current state of the world, no mention of simnet or any other military simulators, and nothing about the internet chess and go servers, the games on thepalace (a graphical mud from ~1996). I can't believe that the online services didn't have lots of other games, either.

I'd welcome suggestions on how to break things up; the variables I see as important are number of players (1, 2, 3-99, massively multiplayer), type of game (action, rpg, board-game/war-game style, etc.), and transport (local, LAN, dialup, wide area network, online service, internet).

It's sparse on cites, but relies heavily on content from other articles, almost all of which do have good cites. I don't think there's any OR in here.

--Akb4 (talk) 06:25, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

other host-based graphics terminal games[edit]

There were some host-based games, including a version of asteroids, written for the Bell Labs BLIT intelligent graphics terminal. See this document. This would be 1981-1983, far later than PLATO, and no multiplayer games (as far as I know), but they might be the only other animated graphics terminal games besides PLATO (unless you count Imlacs). Other possible graphics terminals: Tektronix terminals seem unlikely, given that they couldn't really animate; the whole screen had to clear and repaint to erase a line. DEC GIGIs, or even VT220s with downloadable character sets (or other manufacturers' downloadable charset ttys) might (even probably) had some games, though they would probably be something like chess, because those ttys weren't fast enough for much animation (not that PLATO had much frame rate, either). Maybe DEC GT40's. I suspect the SGI terminals were too rare, too slow, and too non-standardized. I don't know anything about Evans & Sutherland gear. I can't think of any other graphics terminals. -- Akb4 (talk) 20:04, 17 March 2008 (UTC).[reply]

notes on first game to use Internet Protocol Suite (perhaps not SGI Dogfight)[edit]

There was "hunt" (curses-based maze game) on BSD 4.2 in 1986 or maybe before that. It may qualify as the first TCP/IP game, but perhaps not as well known as SGI Dogfight. Hunt is part of the bsdgames package.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of online games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091217051238/http://www.lextrait.com/Vincent/mad.html to http://www.lextrait.com/Vincent/mad.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:05, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]