Talk:Henry Gilman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I removed this article from stub class, because I do not think it fits in that class anymore. Now what class do you think it belongs?

According to the Royal Society Biography of Henry Gilman, Gilman converted to Catholicism when he married. Currently this article is in the “Jewish American scientists” category? Is it appropriate for this article to be in this category since Gilman would not have identified with the Jewish religion for most of his life?

Judaism is an ethnic as well as a religious category. Would anyone remove Albert Einstein?--Runcorn 22:37, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He was Episcopalian and belonged to St. John's in Ames. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Puxesaco (talkcontribs) 07:51, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Father of...[edit]

Gilman cannot be called "father of organometallic chemistry". He may arguably be the father of organometallic chemistry research in the US, but he clearly learned from Grignard etc. John Eisch calls him "American pioneer in the rise of organometallic chemistry" (Organometallics 2002, 21, 5439). That article is a good source of information, though certainly (and understandably) biased in favour of Gilman and of the relative importance of his discoveries.134.130.240.12 (talk) 02:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Henry Gilman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:13, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]