Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHarry Potter and the Deathly Hallows has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHarry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is part of the Harry Potter novels series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 31, 2005Articles for deletionKept
August 15, 2007Good article nomineeListed
August 25, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 14, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
March 16, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
July 11, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
July 30, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
August 4, 2009Good article nomineeListed
February 11, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
February 15, 2011Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 11, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
August 17, 2017Good topic candidatePromoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 21, 2012, and July 21, 2017.
Current status: Good article


Thoughts[edit]

Suggestions for this article:

-Cite the part about the book being translated into 120+ languages.

-Cite where you found the information on the awards this book has one.

-It seems that the record for this book being the fastest selling book ever may be out of date as it's quoted "as of 2012". Is this record still true?

-There seems to be many direct quotes. Perhaps try to paraphrase more of these?

-Overall, very neutral in tone and decent sources considering that there will be very few scientific sources for this topic.

Lauraware4 (talk) 01:38, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cursed Child[edit]

Do we mention anywhere in the article that while Deathly Hallows is the final HP novel, the storyline continues in Cursed Child, like Revolutions being the final Matrix film while the storyline continues in The Matrix Online? Is Cursed Child even canon? If it is, I think we should do this. --Kailash29792 (talk) 10:42, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, because there are so many discrepancies in the Cursed Child (Snape?!) that it isn't a continuation, to such a degree that it is stated to be an alternate timeline. Chaheel Riens (talk) 12:09, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Slight clarification to avoid ambiguity[edit]

Harry also learns that he is an unintentional Horcrux, unbeknownst to Voldemort ...

To avoid ambiguity, where it seems to refer to Snape, correct to

Harry also learns that he himself is an unintentional Horcrux, unbeknownst to Voldemort 87.114.44.165 (talk) 17:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

True, but the books have most information 2A02:3032:315:3326:81AE:EAE0:48F7:4DB4 (talk) 11:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]